OCR Arena

OCR Arena

built by extend.ai

GLM-OCR vs Nanonets2-3B

Head-to-head OCR comparison · 7 battles · Updated July 2, 2026

Nanonets2-3B
GLM-OCR
Matchup71.4%(5W-2L)28.6%(2W-5L)
Overall29.0%(450W-906L)15.5%(59W-276L)
ELO14111355
Rank#17#24

In head-to-head OCR battles, Nanonets2-3B outperforms GLM-OCR with a 71.4% win rate across 7 matchups. Nanonets2-3B currently ranks #17 on the OCR Arena leaderboard with an ELO rating of 1411, while GLM-OCR holds position #24 with an ELO of 1355. These rankings are based on blind community voting where users compare OCR outputs without knowing which model produced each result.

Try it yourself

Test these models on your own documents in the playground.

Open Playground →

Other comparisons

vs Gemini 3 Flashvs Opus 4.6 (Medium)vs Opus 4.6 (Adaptive)vs Opus 4.6 (Low)vs Opus 4.5 (Low)vs Gemini 2.5 Provs Opus 4.5 (Medium)vs Gemini 2.5 Flashvs Sonnet 4.5vs Mistral OCR v3vs Qwen3-VL-8Bvs Gemini 3 Previewvs GPT-5 (Low)vs dots.ocrvs GPT-5.1 (Medium)vs GPT-5.1 (Low)vs GPT-5.2 (Medium)vs Irisvs DeepSeek OCRvs GPT-5 (Medium)vs olmOCR 2vs GPT-5.2 (None)